Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Mystery Of The Missing Dollar, Plus Monty's Doors.
Dean put up a perennial favorite of his, the puzzle of Monty's Doors. It one that seems to cause debate every time he posts it. Fortunately, I remembered it from last time, so this time I could enjoy it as an unconfused observer. Kind of more fun that way. However, this time, only one person disputed the correct answer, and that was because he misread the problem. Perhaps the bloom is off of the Monty's Doors rose. Which made me wonder about an old favorite from my youth. Has it held up? Does everyone see through it? You be the judge:
Thanks again to Andrew for the help on the gleeking vs yanging question, and to any of you who might have chipped in on that one as well.
Three men go to a hotel. The clerk says the room is $30, and each man puts up $10. After they go upstairs, the clerk realizes he overcharged his guests, and the room actually only cost $25. Clerk calls Bellhop over, and tells him to take the $5 change up to the room and return it to the men. Bellhop decides it's too difficult to divide $5 among the three men, and his tips haven't been what they should be lately, so he keeps $2 for himself, and returns $1 each to the three men. $10 paid - $1 returned means each man has only paid $9 for the room. $9 x 3 men = $27. Bellhop kept $2. $27 + $2 = $29. What happened to the missing dollar?
Thanks again to Andrew for the help on the gleeking vs yanging question, and to any of you who might have chipped in on that one as well.
Comments:
<< Home
This isn't so difficult to figure out. As a matter of fact, the trick is staring you right in the face. Any hotel that charges only $10 a head would never give back 5 bucks to 3 suckers who agreed to the higher price.
The solution is that $25 + $5 is $30. What happens to the funds after that doesnt' matter. The bellhop takes two dollars and returns three, so it's still $5 + $25.
There's no dollar missing; you're just being misled. At the end of the question, the $27 is added to the $2, but these are things which shouldn't be added together.
The men paid $27 and kept $3. Who got the $27? The hotel got $25. The bellhop got $2. $27=$25+$2. So, the $2 is already included in the $27; why would you add the $2 to the $27 again?
The men paid $27 and kept $3. Who got the $27? The hotel got $25. The bellhop got $2. $27=$25+$2. So, the $2 is already included in the $27; why would you add the $2 to the $27 again?
The fallacy is in the initial division. If a room is $25/night - then each man should have paid $8.33 (one would have to pay $8.34) each. Which means that the bellhop additionally shorted each man 67 cents (or 66ยข for the $8.34 guy).
Accounting majors should pick up on this right away.
Initially, the men have collectively paid $30 each, with the hotel receiving $30.
After the refund, the men have collectively paid $27, with $27 going to the hotel and bellhop.
The mistake is comparing the amount paid by the men in the end with the amount initially received by the hotel.
In table form:
Before initial Payment:
Men: $30
Hotel: $0
Bellhop: $0
Total: $30
After initial payment:
Men: $0
Hotel: $30
Bellhop: $0
Total: $30
After refund and tip:
Men: $3
Hotel: $25
Bellhop: $2
Total: $30
Initially, the men have collectively paid $30 each, with the hotel receiving $30.
After the refund, the men have collectively paid $27, with $27 going to the hotel and bellhop.
The mistake is comparing the amount paid by the men in the end with the amount initially received by the hotel.
In table form:
Before initial Payment:
Men: $30
Hotel: $0
Bellhop: $0
Total: $30
After initial payment:
Men: $0
Hotel: $30
Bellhop: $0
Total: $30
After refund and tip:
Men: $3
Hotel: $25
Bellhop: $2
Total: $30
As some of you noted, careful thinking carries the day. It's the the wording of the problem that creates the dilemma. The dollar really is there all along. Good job!
Geek.esq explained it magnificently.
The short answer is that at the end, the $2 should be subtracted from the $27, not added.
The guys paid $9 each for the $25 hotel room. Of the $27 paid, the hotel got $25 and the bellhop took $2. Nothing's missing.
Teri
The short answer is that at the end, the $2 should be subtracted from the $27, not added.
The guys paid $9 each for the $25 hotel room. Of the $27 paid, the hotel got $25 and the bellhop took $2. Nothing's missing.
Teri
ok here the real thing
noobs
25$ for the room 3$ back to each man
they work it out to be 29$
but as a matter of fact its 28$+2$ bellhop has is 30$
witch is how they try to trick the gullible noobs that think tht they
paid 9$ each wen they paid 8.333333333etc $ each witch then adds up to be 25$ 2$ bell hop 1$ each man they is ur answer :)_
Post a Comment
noobs
25$ for the room 3$ back to each man
they work it out to be 29$
but as a matter of fact its 28$+2$ bellhop has is 30$
witch is how they try to trick the gullible noobs that think tht they
paid 9$ each wen they paid 8.333333333etc $ each witch then adds up to be 25$ 2$ bell hop 1$ each man they is ur answer :)_
<< Home
Contributors
Catnip
- Lord Floppington, aka Reverend Doctor Lord Rockefeller
- Google News
- USS Clueless
- Instapundit
- Tech Central Station
- Day By Day by Chris Muir
- JCF
- Transterrestrial Musings
- Sanity's Edge
- IMAO
- Michael Moore Hates America
- Free Will
- One Hand Clapping
- Dilbert
- Patterico
- The Family Guy
- Belmont Club
- INDC Journal
- South Park
- Lt. Smash
- TTLB Ecosystem
- The Llama Butchers
- Mountaineer Musings
- South Dakota Politics
- Panhandle Pundit
- Mean Mr Mustard v2.0
- Tolkien Geek Analyzes LOTR
- Nehring the Edge
- Ace of Spades HQ
- Innocent Bystanders
- What's Alan Watching?
- Letters From Desolation Row
- Link Mecca (Allah)
- So Quoted
- Ask Philosophers
- Blowing Smoke
- Dean's World
- Gateway Pundit
- Power Line
- Wizbang
- Captain's Quarters
- Life In & Around Memphis (Rockstar Recaps)
- Indignant Desert Birds
- Future Poopy Diapers
- Standby
- Herr Professor's Educational Bonanza:
- Joanne Jacobs
- Right on the Left Coast: Views From a Conservative Teacher
Litter Box
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- June 2008
- November 2008
- August 2009
- September 2009