Tuesday, October 04, 2005
Again With The Serenity?
Our friend the Bloggin' Bizatch popped in to let me know about another Serenity previewee. His experience was similar to mine noted here, with the whole you're on the list but not necessarily guaranteed a seat thing. Based on the date of his posts, I think he did make it into his preview screening, just like me. Like me, he also had some misgivings about the nature of the whole enterprise. You can read about them here, since, unlike me, he had the nards to actually voice his concerns. He was willing to take the chance that a little impertinence might keep him from getting in.
I didn't mind the notion of being used to promote the movie, or share his other concerns. Hey, I was going to get something for free. But I was a little bothered by the hype they wanted me to put up:
They wanted it, and I put it up. But I just have to say that this is the sort of thing that I normally ignore, once I've gotten over being annoyed by it. To me, it's almost insulting. This sort of hype job has almost become a parody of itself. "Trademark compassion and wit" just irks me. I liked the movie. I liked the series. I did not like the blurb they wanted. I am no professional writer. Probably most bloggers aren't professional writers. However, I believe the effort of each individual to promote the movie as he sees fit would have been much more effective. I count 106 words in the blurb above. If they had said "Hey, to be part of this promotion, write a brief paragraph, 75 to 125 words, about your feelings about Firefly and/or Joss Whedon," they would have gotten much more heartfelt responses, and people reading them would have been more likely to be swayed to see the movie.
A few added thoughts I wrote to SButler:
And here is his review.
Next up: O'Reilly tells us about the smearingest political sites on the web. And you know it's true, because he's just looking out for the folks.
I didn't mind the notion of being used to promote the movie, or share his other concerns. Hey, I was going to get something for free. But I was a little bothered by the hype they wanted me to put up:
Joss Whedon, the Oscar® - and Emmy - nominated writer/director responsible for the worldwide television phenomena of BUFFY THE VAMPIRE, ANGEL and FIREFLY, now applies his trademark compassion and wit to a small band of galactic outcasts 500 years in the future in his feature film directorial debut, Serenity. The film centers around Captain Malcolm Reynolds, a hardened veteran (on the losing side) of a galactic civil war, who now ekes out a living pulling off small crimes and transport-for-hire aboard his ship, Serenity. He leads a small, eclectic crew who are the closest thing he has left to family –squabbling, insubordinate and undyingly loyal.
They wanted it, and I put it up. But I just have to say that this is the sort of thing that I normally ignore, once I've gotten over being annoyed by it. To me, it's almost insulting. This sort of hype job has almost become a parody of itself. "Trademark compassion and wit" just irks me. I liked the movie. I liked the series. I did not like the blurb they wanted. I am no professional writer. Probably most bloggers aren't professional writers. However, I believe the effort of each individual to promote the movie as he sees fit would have been much more effective. I count 106 words in the blurb above. If they had said "Hey, to be part of this promotion, write a brief paragraph, 75 to 125 words, about your feelings about Firefly and/or Joss Whedon," they would have gotten much more heartfelt responses, and people reading them would have been more likely to be swayed to see the movie.
A few added thoughts I wrote to SButler:
I really enjoyed the movie too. It was different from the series, but in a good way. One of the things that bugged me about the many of the Trek movies was that they seemed to think that since it was a movie, they should go crazy with the cosmetic details, altered uniforms and such, and gave not nearly as much effort to the story. Serenity did feel a bit rushed, especially for those familiar with the Firefly series. I wouldn't blame Whedon though. He just didn't have the luxury of ten or twelve hours to fully play out a massive story arc. He did do a great job with the time that he had, and I think he made the film accessible to those who had never seen the series as well.
And here is his review.
Next up: O'Reilly tells us about the smearingest political sites on the web. And you know it's true, because he's just looking out for the folks.
Comments:
<< Home
I also had the same concerns about the offer: Serenity, Now. There's more (not entirely sober) discussion in the comments.
I'm glad I went, despite my misgivings (and I probably spent close to $45 in travel and parking costs). I'd do it again for Whedon in a heartbeat... but probably not for someone like Lucas.
Post a Comment
I'm glad I went, despite my misgivings (and I probably spent close to $45 in travel and parking costs). I'd do it again for Whedon in a heartbeat... but probably not for someone like Lucas.
<< Home
Contributors
Catnip
- Lord Floppington, aka Reverend Doctor Lord Rockefeller
- Google News
- USS Clueless
- Instapundit
- Tech Central Station
- Day By Day by Chris Muir
- JCF
- Transterrestrial Musings
- Sanity's Edge
- IMAO
- Michael Moore Hates America
- Free Will
- One Hand Clapping
- Dilbert
- Patterico
- The Family Guy
- Belmont Club
- INDC Journal
- South Park
- Lt. Smash
- TTLB Ecosystem
- The Llama Butchers
- Mountaineer Musings
- South Dakota Politics
- Panhandle Pundit
- Mean Mr Mustard v2.0
- Tolkien Geek Analyzes LOTR
- Nehring the Edge
- Ace of Spades HQ
- Innocent Bystanders
- What's Alan Watching?
- Letters From Desolation Row
- Link Mecca (Allah)
- So Quoted
- Ask Philosophers
- Blowing Smoke
- Dean's World
- Gateway Pundit
- Power Line
- Wizbang
- Captain's Quarters
- Life In & Around Memphis (Rockstar Recaps)
- Indignant Desert Birds
- Future Poopy Diapers
- Standby
- Herr Professor's Educational Bonanza:
- Joanne Jacobs
- Right on the Left Coast: Views From a Conservative Teacher
Litter Box
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- June 2008
- November 2008
- August 2009
- September 2009